Low Dose Clonazepam for Autism - SFARI Webinar with William Catterall
This post will be mainly of interest to the small number of people using low-dose clonazepam for autism and those considering doing so.
This therapy modifies the excitatory/inhibitory (im)balance between the GABA and Glutamate neurotransmitters. The big advantage is that it should be very safe, is extremely inexpensive and, unlike Bumetanide, does not cause diuresis. The disadvantage is that the effective dose is only in a narrow window, and you have to find it by trial and error.
Does it work?
It certainly does work in some children with autism.
It also appears to have an additional effect over Bumetanide alone, at least my son.
Questions remain:
· Does it work with everyone who responds to bumetanide?
· Does it only work in people with a Nav1.1 dysfunction?
· Will bumetanide work in everyone who responds to Clonazepam?
One of my earlier, detailed, posts on this subject is this one:-
Just google “clonazepam epiphany” or use the site index, for the other posts.
Professor Catterall
I have already covered the science behind low-dose Clonazepam and Professor Catterall’s trials in two mouse models. It is quite a complex subject and in the end most people just want to know does it work in humans with autism or not.
Catterall’s research was funded by the Simons Foundation, so no surprise really that he made a Webinar for SFARI. It covers the ground of those two papers and indicates the next steps for his research.
It is a bit lighter going than his papers, but it is a full hour of science.
Catterall plans to trial it in humans with autism, starting with those known to have sodium channel dysfunction. So he is following the same pattern he used with his mice.
The first mouse model he used was Dravet syndrome, a rare condition leading to epilepsy and autism which is caused by a sodium ion channel (Nav1.1) dysfunction. The second experiment used a standard mouse model of autism called the BTBR mouse model, so no connection with sodium channels.
My question to Catterall was whether this therapy would only work in people with a Nav1.1 dysfunction. He did respond via the comments on the post, but did not really answer the question. The fact that he plans to trial his idea on humans with autism with a known sodium ion channel dysfunction, does suggest something at least.
I think that since the actual mechanism of the drug is on a sub-unit of the GABAA receptor, sodium channels may actually be more of a coincidence, meaning that while autism Nav1.1 dysfunction may indeed indicate this therapy, it may be applicable in other autism where GABA is dysfunctional.
Bumetanide Use
The downside of bumetanide use to correct the E/I imbalance often found in autism is the diuresis and excessive loss of potassium in about 20% of people.
If you revisit the original paper suggesting an E/I imbalance might be fundamental to many kinds of autism, you will see that this E/I imbalance is not just an ongoing issue, it is potentially an avoidable cause of disruption at key points in the brain’s development prior to maturation. In simpler terms, an E/I imbalance during development may cause the physical brain abnormalities often observed in autism.
That would suggest you should try and reverse E/I imbalance as soon as possible, well before maturation of the brain.
One day an analog of bumetanide may be developed, that avoids the diuresis; it is already being discussed.
Bumetanide (or low dose Clonazepam) use, even before autism has become established ?
In something like 30% of cases of classic autism there is macrocephaly (a big head), which even shows up on ultrasound scans of the pregnant mother. A big head does not necessarily mean autism, but specific types of autism are clearly associated with big heads.
There are many other well known risk factors, like siblings with autism, siblings with other disabilities, older parents, family history (schizophrenia, bipolar, auto-immune conditions, COPD, Nobel Laureates, math prodigies) etc.
Since we also know that an indicator of this kind of E/I imbalance is that benzodiazepine drugs can show paradoxical effects (they work in reverse), it should be possible to make some kind of predictive diagnostic test.
So it would not be rocket science to identify many babies at elevated risk of autism and then treatment could be started very early and well before brain maturation.
This is rather like the Japanese researchers in the previous post suggesting that sulforaphane consumption in childhood might prevent susceptible people developing schizophrenia in adulthood.
Comments
Post a Comment